Stoianoglo case provoked dissensions between prosecutor Victor Furtună and the interim head of the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, Adrian Bordianu. The latter asked Furtună to present written explanations, and the subordinate did not comply and complained to the Superior Council of Prosecutors (CSP) that the chief was putting pressure on him in connection with the Stoianoglo case. The audio recording was made public on the anticorruption.md portal.
In an audio recording of a discussion between Bordianu and Furtună, the former informed him that there was a request for recusal in connection with the Stoianiglos case and asked him to present written explanations. Victor Furtună refused to comply, motivating that he was appointed by the Superior Council of Prosecutors to investigate Stoianoglo and in this case he is not a hierarchically superior prosecutor.
Furtuna asked Bordianu to give him written instructions to explain the request for recusal. Bordianu refused in a high tone and told Furtună that he did not trust him. We specify that Victor Furtună complained to Bordianu at the CSP that he had put pressure on him starting with the day when he was appointed to examine the denunciation submitted by the MP Lilian Carp on behalf of Stoianoglo. One of the alleged pressures claimed by Furtună was the fact that he was not assigned a registration number to the file started on the name of the general prosecutor.
Adrian Bordianu did not respond to calls to comment on the allegations. In the telephone conversation held shortly after Furtună’s appointment, Adrian Bordianu gave us assurances that there will be no internal or external pressure on his subordinate.
“The status of prosecutor gives him procedural freedom. The only pressure that exists now is from society. I think Victor Furtună is prepared enough to professionally and independently investigate such a resonance case. I assure you that there will be no pressure from us and me “, said the interim head of the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office. Adrian Bordianu then informed us that there is a request to challenge Prosecutor Furtună.
Sources from the CSP informed us that the request for recusal of prosecutor Victor Furtună was signed by Vasile Gafton, Alexandr Stoianoglo’s lawyer. The same sources specified that both the request for recusal and the complaint of prosecutor Victor Furtună were sent for examination to the interim general prosecutor, Dumitru Robu, appointed and appointed on Wednesday evening. Victor Furtună complained about Bordianu to the CSP that he had put pressure on him starting with the day when he was appointed to examine the denunciation submitted by the deputy Lilian Carp on behalf of Stoianoglo. One of the alleged pressures claimed by Furtună was the fact that he was not assigned a registration number to the file started on the name of the general prosecutor.
Adrian Bordianu did not respond to calls to comment on the allegations. In the telephone conversation held shortly after Furtună’s appointment, Adrian Bordianu gave us assurances that there will be no internal or external pressure on his subordinate.
“The status of prosecutor gives him procedural freedom. The only pressure that exists now is from society. I think Victor Furtună is prepared enough to professionally and independently investigate such a resonance case. I assure you that there will be no pressure from us and me “, said the interim head of the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office.
Adrian Bordianu then informed us that there is a request to challenge Prosecutor Furtună. Sources from the SCP informed us that the request for recusal of prosecutor Victor Furtună was signed by Vasile Gafton, Alexandr Stoianoglo’s lawyer. The same sources specified that both the request for recusal and the complaint of prosecutor Victor Furtună were sent for examination to the interim general prosecutor, Dumitru Robu, appointed aon Wednesday evening.
! Acest articol este proprietatea SafeNews.md și este protejat de legea drepturilor de autor. Orice preluare a conținutului se poate face DOAR în limită maximă de 1000 de semne. În mod OBLIGATORIU cu indicarea în TITLU a sursei citate, iar în text cu LINK ACTIV către pagina acestui articol. Preluarea integrală se poate realiza doar în condițiile unui ACORD prealabil întocmit cu redacția portalului.
